Review: Fifty Shades of Grey (2015)

Fifty Shades of Grey, 2015
this review is free of spoilers! but have you seriously not read the book?

When thinking of ways to describe the new erotic film Fifty Shades of Grey, one word immediately comes to mind: stiffAnd not in the good way. There’s no point in tiptoeing around it, so knowing that what follows comes from someone who actually wanted this movie to succeed, here it goes. Considering the movie itself, without the story, there are three things fundamentally wrong with it: rhythm, cinematography, and tone. It is shocking how serious the lack of rhythm and flow in Fifty Shades is – like you can actually feel the end of one scene, the beginning of the next, and the awkward pause in between – it’s like watching dozens of little snippets of the least risqué BDSM love affair ever.

And it doesn’t look particularly good either, in fact the camera work and editing is often inadequate or just plain corny (that slow-motion + fading sex montage? what were you thinking?!), and right in the one genre where cinematography is essential.

And finally, this thing has sharper mood swings than a teenager with PMS. I imagine they were aiming to go from funny to sexy and all fifty tones in between with grace and ease, but it’s just exhausting, confusing, and sloppy. Oh by sexy of course I mean clinical-looking, fake-moaning, awkward-humping sex. And just to be clear, that has nothing to do with the nature of their sexual relationship.

Now onto to the really bad stuff: all of this poor executing is sitting on top of this absurd plot that best resembles a teen sexual fantasy (and a bad one at that), riddled with all the classic clichés that even telenovelas grew out of by now, and a dialogue so bad it redefines the meaning of cringe. It’s boring, unforgivably emotionless, and unexciting. It elicits no thrills and pushes no boundaries whatsoever. It doesn’t even come close to the edge. It just sits there, with its mild bondage and a butt plug joke. The only outrageous thing about Fifty Shades of Grey is how insufferably bad it is – so, you know, a pretty faithful adaptation of E.L. James’s erotica.

There is, however, exactly one good thing in it
: its sense of humour. And, at this point, I seriously hope it was intentional. As done by others before it – think laugh-out-loud Nine and a Half Weeks, but don’t get your hopes up – Fifty Shades resorts to comedy to soften the blow of its darkest kinks (or in their minds, to ease a sexual tension that is non-existent), cleverly playing with double-meanings and our own knowledge of Grey’s peculiar hobbies. This was actually a great call.

It’s in those moments that the leads thrive in near-perfect comedic timing, but in every other scene Dakota Johnson and Jamie Dornan just look uncomfortable, stiff, hollow. Frustrating.

Like the twilight fan-fiction turned book by impressive marketing, Fifty Shades has no clue what it wants to be, no clue just how good it could be. Both Sam Taylor-Johnson and E.L. James were sitting on material with actual potential and, forgive the bluntness, but they both simply blew it.



  1. Brittani
    February 14, 2015 / 4:18 PM

    Nice review! None of this really surprises me. Not even the fact that they apparently went really tame with the sex scenes. (No frontal nudity? the fuck?) Oh well, hopefully it doesn’t ruin Sam Taylor Johnson’s career.

    • February 14, 2015 / 7:49 PM

      I was probably in denial, thinking it could actually be good. I kept the illusion until I saw the clips on Fallon and it looked so, so bad. Oh I like Taylor-Johnson too, and the actors, so I hope is the next couple of movies are better.

  2. February 14, 2015 / 7:03 PM

    I refuse to read this book. I haven’t even picked it up at the bookstore or library out of curiosity. Will I see the film? Probably not. I haven’t heard one good thing about it yet (obviously). Your review was really good, though, very insightful (and witty too)!

    • February 14, 2015 / 7:53 PM

      Well I can’t really recommend it either. If anyone wants to read erotica there are dozens of better options (and, to be fair, dozens worse as well), so my one hopeful thought is that readers will move on to better things. Thank you, Vanessa! I was still in a 50 shades haze when I wrote it, but I guess that can be a good thing sometimes.

  3. February 20, 2015 / 3:58 PM

    I think there was never potential because how can you make something out of that book.. sorry but I hate it so much that it actually hurts. The whole thing about Fifty hurts me because I can never imagine having that success with a thing like that… it hurts.

    Everything about this movie, this franchise, hurts me. The fact that Dornan is connected to it, hurts me. It’s just so sad and bad and.. god, how can you call that literature or movie making when it’s just that empty!?

    • February 20, 2015 / 4:12 PM

      I was hoping it was a loose adaptation, haha. Oh I get that, it makes me angry just thinking about Fifty Shades. Idk how something this bad got so big, either.

      You know one critic here actually compared Dornan to a radiator. It hurts, I know.

  4. Josh
    April 3, 2015 / 10:31 PM

    Great review! I’m not sure if I’ll give this a chance or not, but my expectations couldn’t be any lower.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *